RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Gynecologic oncologists are uncertain about the safety of tibolone application in cervical adenocarcinoma (AC) patients. This study examined the possible adverse effects of tibolone on the survival of cervical AC patients. METHODS: Medical records of 70 cervical AC patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages IA to IB were reviewed. A bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was performed in all patients, and survival outcomes between tibolone users (n=38) and non-users (n=32) were compared. RESULTS: A comparison of the tibolone users with non-users revealed similar clinicopathological variables. Progression-free survival (P=0.34) and overall survival (P=0.22) were similar in the users and non-users. The risks of progression (hazard ratio [HR], 1.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46-6.37; P=0.43) and death (HR, 1.59; 95% CI, 0.06-45.66; P=0.79) were also similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Tibolone has no adverse effect on the survival of cervical AC patients and can be administered safely to this population. These findings may be helpful in improving the quality of life of cervical AC patients.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the effect of the specific human papillomavirus (HPV) genotype as a prognostic factor in stage I-IIA cervical cancer patients following primary surgical treatment. METHODS: The medical records of 116 cervical cancer patients treated with primary surgical treatment were reviewed. The HPV genotypes were categorized into following groups: negative and unclassified, HPV 16, HPV 18, and other high risk (HPV 31, 33, 35, 45, 51, 52, 56, and 58). RESULTS: Among the HPV genotypes, HPV 16 predominated (40.52%), followed by intermediate risk and unclassified (25%), HPV 18, 45, and 56 (17.24%) and negative (17.24%). In univariate analysis, HPV genotypes (P=0.03), parametrial spread (P=0.02), depth of invasion (DOI) (P<0.01) and lymph-vascular space invasion (P=0.02) were significantly associated with progression free survival (PFS). In multivariate analysis, HPV 18 (hazard ratio [HR], 5.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29 to 20.90; P=0.02) and ≥one half of DOI (HR, 5.4; 95% CI, 1.08 to 27.31; P=0.04) were significantly associated with PFS. HPV genotypes are not significantly associated with overall survival. CONCLUSION: HPV 18 was a poor prognostic factor for the PFS in stage I-IIA cervical cancer patients following primary surgical treatment. Careful long-term observation and regular exams are recommended for cervical cancer patients with HPV 18 compared to those with other HPV genotypes.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the presence of high risk-human papilloma virus (HR-HPV) after conization of the cervix was a risk factor for persistence or recurrence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and whether HR-HPV test could be a guideline for post-therapy surveillance. METHODS: The study retrospectively analyzed data from 243 patients who underwent LLETZ or CKC of the cervix due to CIN. RESULTS: A positive HR-HPV test result which was performed between 3 and 6 months after procedure was a risk factor for persistent or recurrent cytological (p<0.001, odds ratio [OR]=22.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]=9.74-52.02) and pathological (p<0.001, OR=18.28, 95% CI=5.55-60.20) abnormalities. CONCLUSION: HR-HPV positive patients between 3 and 6 months after procedure should undergo frequent and meticulous post-therapy surveillance, while HR-HPV negative patients do not require such high-level surveillance and could undergo routine surveillance.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the safety, efficacy and impact on survival of low anterior resection and primary anastomosis at the time of en bloc resection for primary and recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 46 primary and 14 recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma patients who underwent procedures between April 2001 and May 2005 in our center. Data were obtained from patient medical records and the cancer registry. Parameters for safety, efficacy and survival were considered as primary endpoints. RESULTS: For primary advanced ovarian cancer patients, 43.5% showed no visible tumor at the completion of surgery and optimal cytorection (residual tumor [RT] less than or equal 5 mm) was achieved in 89.2%. Complications associated with en bloc resection occurred in two patients (1 leakage of anastomosis site and 1 rectovaginal fistula), and these were managed with diversion colostomy. Patients with no visible residual tumor had longer disease-free survival compared to those with visible RT (median, 30 vs. 7 months; P=0.0082) and longer overall survival (3-year survival rate, 82.03% vs. 66.63%; P=0.0437). Patients with rectal invasions up to the serosa/subserosa had longer disease-free survival than those with rectal invasion up to the muscle/mucosa (P=0.0176) but did not differ significantly in terms of overall survival (P=0.0880). For recurrent ovarian cancer patients, 42.9% showed no visible tumor at the completion of surgery and optimal cytorection was achieved in 64.3%. One patient experienced an en-bloc-resection-associated complication (a rectovaginal fistula), which was managed conservatively. Patients with no visible residual tumor (RT) had longer disease-free survival than visible RT patients (median, not reached vs. 5 months; P=0.0156) but did not differ significantly in terms of overall survival (median, 32 months for no visible RT vs. 24 months for visible RT patients; P=0.0833). There were no surgery-related deaths among the overall 60 primary and recurrent ovarian cancer patients. CONCLUSIONS: En bloc resection of primary and recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinomas with low anterior resection permits a high rate of complete debulking with acceptable morbidity and mortality rates. Patients with no visible RT after surgery had a survival advantage over patients with visible RT.
